science advances under evaluation

The Discussion describes the conclusions drawn from the Results and restates in detail the significance and implications of the research presented. Under review - The handling editor has begun to invite peer reviewers to evaluate . Science journals also instruct and expect the Advisory Board and reviewers to treat manuscripts as confidential material. Keep movies brief and the display window small to minimize the file size of the video. This applies throughout the evaluation process at. As a peer reviewer for Science magazine, you are part of a valued community. Science Advances 2020 Impact Factor: 13.1. It could be either the editor or one of the reviewers. Since this version could be accepted by the Editors, it should be complete and as you intend it to appear in the journal. No. You may also choose to start a new review process. Please provide a point-by-point response to reviewer comments uploaded as a separate document (.pdf or .docx) under Auxiliary Supplementary Materials in the submission record. The timeframe for editorial evaluation is longer than standard evaluations. Ethical Guidelines to Publication of Chemical Research (American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, January 2000). stream 오래 붙들고 있는거 자체도 그렇지만 스테이터스가 자주 변한다는게 분명 좋은 신호이긴 한데.. 언제나 그렇지만 설레발은 금물이고 잊어먹고 있는게 속편함.. 대댓글 1개 대댓글 쓰기 해당 댓글을 보려면 로그인이 필요합니다. Please do not use footnotes in column heads; include such details in the table legend. As you have pointed out, the review time for a revised manuscript should ideally be shorter than that of the original manuscript as the reviewers are already familiar with the paper. Readership – Articles published in Science Advances may be featured in Science and recommended to readers through our shared publishing platform. If we do not receive comments we will proceed based on the reviews in hand. I submitted a manuscript in an Elsevier journal around 3.5 months ago. Detailed information about preparing a Focus. A complete manuscript package will help expedite your paper through the review and publication process. AAAS is a partner of HINARI, AGORA, OARE, CHORUS, CLOCKSS, CrossRef and COUNTER. The Editorial and Publishing teams at AAAS/Science have evaluated the work of the companies listed below and have found them to be effective outlets for language editing services. Enter the required 125-character (or less including spaces) teaser in the field in the submission portal. Under Objective 2, we will develop new advances in data science that will make it possible to enhance the capabilities of FoodS3 to model APS supply chains and to simulate supply and demand shocks. How to write an email to the editor inquiring about the current status of my paper? Supplementary materials are permitted but should be limited to information that is not essential to the general understanding of the research presented in the main text, such as unaltered blots and source data, as well as other file types. Download Science's Instructions for Reviewers (PDF Format): Council of Science Editors, White Paper on Promoting Integrity in Scientific Journal Publications. For instance, we have changed the very last word from 'reviewers' to 'revisions.' Now, let's get to your query. Our Press Office may identify specific Science Advances articles as particularly newsworthy and highlight them in our embargoed press package for registered journalists. 그리고 내 경험으로는 리젝은 스테이터스가 변하는 동시에 보내기 때문에 스테이터스 변화를 알아채기 전에 리젝메일부터 먼저 받게 되어 있음. Reviews should be constructive and courteous and the reviewer should respect the intellectual independence of the author. The Science Advances Editorial Board, a group of active researchers and scientists with a wide diversity of expertise, evaluates submissions and sends those that warrant further consideration for external peer review. o��T�ڋ������"�)i,U�k�-T$2�,(h$M2i+�F�В\9���JwH���)�&��G�PR�Rܶ��T:|cJ%�� �7��A)�~'��Y��n�v����3�:w����6�&�ϙ����g٦����(�/Lc�Z��~�u��3�]jH�'��'H5���� The editor has to communicate their decision to the Editor-in-Chief (EiC) through the ‘Decision in Process’ status. Cover letter (PDF or Word) which includes: Describe briefly why your work is appropriate for, Any information needed to ensure a fair review process, including related manuscripts submitted to other journals, A statement confirming that none of the material has been published or is under consideration for publication elsewhere, A statement noting potential conflicts of interest, For investigations on humans, a statement indicating that informed consent was obtained after the nature and possible consequences of the studies were explained, For authors using laboratory animals, a statement that the animals' care was in accordance with institutional guidelines, Specification of where all data underlying the study are available, or will be deposited, and whether there are any restrictions on data availability such as a materials transfer agreement (MTA), Information on any reference material or additional data files uploaded to the Auxiliary files section (see below), A suggestion for a Deputy and an Associate Editor best qualified to handle the paper. Information for authors. Our standard data availability statement is as follows: “All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials.”. Research Resources should describe how the technique, tool or database could lead to important and substantial advances in understanding key questions in subsequent studies. For all questions regarding APCs, discounts, licensing or general business inquiries, please contact the business office. Discover Water CiteScore: 0.00. It publishes high-quality, original research and reviews in . These policies state author rights and responsibilities which you agree to by submitting and publishing a paper with AAAS. Author institutional affiliations should be listed beneath the author list and referenced by superscript numbers by each appropriate name. The Science Advances Editorial Board, a group of active researchers and scientists with a wide diversity of expertise, evaluates submissions and sends those that warrant further consideration for external peer review. Around 3 weeks later, they updated the status "under review" again. <>/XObject<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI] >>/MediaBox[ 0 0 960 540] /Contents 4 0 R/Group<>/Tabs/S/StructParents 0>> What does a status change from 'with editor' to 'under editor evaluation' mean? How long should I wait for a response from the journal? All tables and figures should be cited in numerical order. endobj The final sentence should describe the main conclusions of the research. AAAS is an international non-profit organization and publisher dedicated to advancing science around the world by serving as an educator. //--> Once all reviews are in, you will be invited to read the other reviews and make additional comments within 2 business days. B. Thomas. 1. If you have any professional or financial affiliations that may be perceived as a conflict of interest in reviewing the manuscript, or a history of personal differences with the author(s), you should describe them in your confidential comments. Answered by Editage Insights 체감상 네이쳐보다 더 빠르고 2주 넘기는 경우 거의 못 봄. [CDATA[// > [CDATA[// >